Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32815/jibeka.v19i2.2259Keywords:
Criticism, Accountability, Social Forestry Partnership, Jurgen HabermasAbstract
This study aims to reveal the reality of accountability of the LMDH Wono Lestari forestry partnership and criticize the practices that occur from Habermas' perspective. This research uses a qualitative method of critical paradigm case study. The research site is at LMDH Wono Lestari, Burno Village, Lumajang Regency. Informants consisted of representatives of the new LMDH management, old LMDH members, Perum Perhutani employees, agricultural commodity offtakers, and the community. Data analysis uses Jurgen Habermas' critical perspective. Accountability practices such as transparency and LMDH functions do not work. Likewise, there is low member participation, lack of management participation, and work plans that are not running well. The above causes internal and external conflicts for LMDH. It is necessary to update regulations and clarify the profit-sharing mechanism regarding the Forestry Partnership between LMDH Wono Lestari and Perum Perhutani in terms of accountability and transparency, such as the involvement of the Village Government as a partnership supervisor, as well as instilling honesty and expecting blessings from the Forestry Partnership.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Awang, S. A., Himmah, W. T., Astuti, B., Septiana, A., & RM Solehudin Novenanto, A. (2008). Panduan pemberdayaan lembaga masyarakat desa hutan (LMDH). CIFOR.
BintangEmpat.com. (2020). Ditanya Soal AD ART Elite LMDH Bungkam. https://bintangempat.com/2020/09/ditanya-soal-ad-art-elite-lmdh-bungkam/
Brölmann, C. (2023). Transparency as a Contested Fundamental in the Law of International Organizations. International Organizations Law Review, 20(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-20010002
Cahyani, N. (2023). Pengaruh Transparansi Laporan Keuangan, Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Terhadap Tingkat Kepercayaan Muzakki untuk Membayar Zakat Pada LAZ Inisiatif Zakat Sumut. Jurnal Manajemen Akuntansi (JUMSI), 3(3), 1879–1896.
Cusimano, S., & Sterner, B. (2020). The Objectivity of Organizational Functions. Acta Biotheoretica, 68(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-019-09365-9
Farazmand, A., De Simone, E., Capasso, S., & Gaeta, G. L. (2021). Articles for a Special Issue of Public Organization Review (POR) on Corruption, Lack of Transparency and the Misuse of Public Funds in Times of Crisis. Public Organization Review, 21(2), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00529-1
Galingging, Y. D. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Keuangan Terhadap Public Trust (Studi pada Jemaat HKBP Cendana Nauli). Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Hardiman, F. B., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2022). Diskursus Sains Kontemporer dan Implikasinya pada Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 13(1), 1–15.
Holyoke, T. T. (2013). A dynamic model of member participation in interest groups. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(3), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.8
Huang, C.-S., & Gong, D.-C. (2019). How Participation Management Influences Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Perceived Fit and Leader-Member Exchange. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(12), 191. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n12p191
Ibsen, M. F. (2023). Jürgen Habermas and the Communicative Paradigm of Critical Theory. In A Critical Theory of Global Justice (pp. 149–199). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192864123.003.0006
Kakasur, N. O. (2022). The Communicative Action of Habermas. Journal of University of Raparin, 9(5), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(9).No(5).Paper18
Kosasih, D. A., Adhya, I., & Herlina, N. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Analisis Kelembagaan LMDH dalam Program Pengelolaan Hutan bersama Masyarakat di RPH Wanaraja BKPH Cibatu KPH Garut. Prosiding Fahutan, 2(02).
Kurniawan, R., Mulawarman, A. D., & Kamayanti, A. (2014). Biological Assets Valuation Reconstruction: A Critical Study of IAS 41 on Agricultural Accounting in Indonesian Farmers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.052
Little, D. (2020). Sources of Organizational Failure (pp. 91–109). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48923-6_6
Mishenina, H., & Dvorak, J. (2022). Public–Private Partnership as a Form of Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Forest Management Sphere. Administrative Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040156
mongabay.co.id. (2019). Mampu Kelola Kelembagaan, Kunci Desa Burno Menjadi Desa Hutan Sejahtera. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2019/07/06/mampu-kelola-kelembagaan-desa-hutan-kunci-desa-burno-menuju-sejahtera/
Nabillah, A. P., Utami, N. T., & Silalahi, Y. (2023). Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Organisasi Pengelola Zakat (OPZ) untuk Mengurangi Tingkat Kemiskinan melalui Perspektif Kelembagaan Islam. Diponegoro Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 2(1), 71–84.
Nanuru, R. F. (2011). Ontologi Hibualamo dalam Perspektif Jurgen Habermas. Jurnal Filsafat , 21(1).
Nurdiwaty, D., Djamhuri, A., & Kamayanti, A. (2014). Institusionalisasi Akuntansi Sosial Pada Perum Perhutani Blitar. EL MUHASABA: Jurnal Akuntansi (e-Journal), 5(1), 75–101.
Ortega-Rodríguez, C., Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., & Moreno-Albarracín, A. L. (2020). Transparency as a Key Element in Accountability in Non-Profit Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(14), 5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145834
Pameila, N. E. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Perhutanan Sosial di Desa Burno Kecamatan Senduro Kabupaten Lumajang.
Purba, P. R., Rahmawaty, & Susilowati, A. (2022). Analysis of income from pine resin tapping on Forest Farmers Groups in partnership with UPT KPH Region II Pematang Siantar. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1115(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1115/1/012060
Rachmawan, D., Seda, F. S. S. E., & Siburian, R. (2021). Melengkapi Analisa Teori Akses dengan Pendekatan Kolaboratif pada Konteks Program Perhutanan Sosial: Studi Kasus Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH) Rawa Sakti, Pemalang. Jurnal Kawistara, 11(2), 156–173.
Rahmatullah, R. (2012). Model Kemitraan Pemerintah dengan Perusahaan dalam Mengelola CSR: Studi Kasus di Kota Cilegon. Sosio Informa: Kajian Permasalahan Sosial Dan Usaha Kesejahteraan Sosial, 17(1).
Rahmawati, A., Rahma, E., Djahratun, S., & others. (2022). Sistem Operasional Syariah (Bagi Hasil/Profit Sharing). Al-Mizan: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 5(1).
Roosanti, N. G., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Karjoko, L. (2022). Forestry Partnership as an Alternative for Settlement of Forestry Disputes in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i7-02
sitinurbaya.com. (2021). Pembangunan Wilayah Terpadu Berbasis Hutan Sosial. http://sitinurbaya.com/pembangunan-wilayah-terpadu-berbasis-hutan-sosial
Solie, A. T., Supratman, Malamassam, D., & Ridwan. (2020). Analysis of social forestry governance in Jeneberang i forest manajement unit. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/486/1/012030
Srivastava, D., & Verma, A. (2022). Workers Participation in Management. The Social ION, 11(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.5958/2456-7523.2022.00006.4
Sumual, F. F. B., Mandagi, M., & Kairupan, S. B. (2022). Forestry Partnership Policy Between Farmer Group and Production Forest Management Unit Poigar Model. www.techniumscience.com
Sunarso, S. (2022). Gagalnya Program Perhutanan Sosial: Studi Kasus LMDH Ngimbang Makmur, Desa Ngimbang, Kecamatan Palang, Kabupaten Tuban. MEDIA BINA ILMIAH, 16(8), 7301–7312.
Supriyanto, H., Sudarmo, S., & Setyowati, K. (2021). Implementation of Social Forestry in Perum Perhutani Kph Telawa. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 18(1), 31–43.
Widati, S., Triyuwono, I., & Sukoharsono, E. G. (2011). Wujud, Makna dan Akuntabilitas “Amal Usaha” sebagai Aset Ekonomi Organisasi Religius Feminis. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 2(3), 369–380.
Yang, C., & Shang, H. (2023). Does forestry public-private partnership promote the development of China’s forestry economy? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1135035
BintangEmpat.com. (2020). Ditanya Soal AD ART Elite LMDH Bungkam. https://bintangempat.com/2020/09/ditanya-soal-ad-art-elite-lmdh-bungkam/
Brölmann, C. (2023). Transparency as a Contested Fundamental in the Law of International Organizations. International Organizations Law Review, 20(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-20010002
Cahyani, N. (2023). Pengaruh Transparansi Laporan Keuangan, Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Terhadap Tingkat Kepercayaan Muzakki untuk Membayar Zakat Pada LAZ Inisiatif Zakat Sumut. Jurnal Manajemen Akuntansi (JUMSI), 3(3), 1879–1896.
Cusimano, S., & Sterner, B. (2020). The Objectivity of Organizational Functions. Acta Biotheoretica, 68(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-019-09365-9
Farazmand, A., De Simone, E., Capasso, S., & Gaeta, G. L. (2021). Articles for a Special Issue of Public Organization Review (POR) on Corruption, Lack of Transparency and the Misuse of Public Funds in Times of Crisis. Public Organization Review, 21(2), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00529-1
Galingging, Y. D. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Keuangan Terhadap Public Trust (Studi pada Jemaat HKBP Cendana Nauli). Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Hardiman, F. B., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2022). Diskursus Sains Kontemporer dan Implikasinya pada Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 13(1), 1–15.
Holyoke, T. T. (2013). A dynamic model of member participation in interest groups. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(3), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.8
Huang, C.-S., & Gong, D.-C. (2019). How Participation Management Influences Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Perceived Fit and Leader-Member Exchange. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(12), 191. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n12p191
Ibsen, M. F. (2023). Jürgen Habermas and the Communicative Paradigm of Critical Theory. In A Critical Theory of Global Justice (pp. 149–199). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192864123.003.0006
Kakasur, N. O. (2022). The Communicative Action of Habermas. Journal of University of Raparin, 9(5), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(9).No(5).Paper18
Kosasih, D. A., Adhya, I., & Herlina, N. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Analisis Kelembagaan LMDH dalam Program Pengelolaan Hutan bersama Masyarakat di RPH Wanaraja BKPH Cibatu KPH Garut. Prosiding Fahutan, 2(02).
Kurniawan, R., Mulawarman, A. D., & Kamayanti, A. (2014). Biological Assets Valuation Reconstruction: A Critical Study of IAS 41 on Agricultural Accounting in Indonesian Farmers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.052
Little, D. (2020). Sources of Organizational Failure (pp. 91–109). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48923-6_6
Mishenina, H., & Dvorak, J. (2022). Public–Private Partnership as a Form of Ensuring Sustainable Development of the Forest Management Sphere. Administrative Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040156
mongabay.co.id. (2019). Mampu Kelola Kelembagaan, Kunci Desa Burno Menjadi Desa Hutan Sejahtera. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2019/07/06/mampu-kelola-kelembagaan-desa-hutan-kunci-desa-burno-menuju-sejahtera/
Nabillah, A. P., Utami, N. T., & Silalahi, Y. (2023). Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Organisasi Pengelola Zakat (OPZ) untuk Mengurangi Tingkat Kemiskinan melalui Perspektif Kelembagaan Islam. Diponegoro Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 2(1), 71–84.
Nanuru, R. F. (2011). Ontologi Hibualamo dalam Perspektif Jurgen Habermas. Jurnal Filsafat , 21(1).
Nurdiwaty, D., Djamhuri, A., & Kamayanti, A. (2014). Institusionalisasi Akuntansi Sosial Pada Perum Perhutani Blitar. EL MUHASABA: Jurnal Akuntansi (e-Journal), 5(1), 75–101.
Ortega-Rodríguez, C., Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., & Moreno-Albarracín, A. L. (2020). Transparency as a Key Element in Accountability in Non-Profit Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(14), 5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145834
Pameila, N. E. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Perhutanan Sosial di Desa Burno Kecamatan Senduro Kabupaten Lumajang.
Purba, P. R., Rahmawaty, & Susilowati, A. (2022). Analysis of income from pine resin tapping on Forest Farmers Groups in partnership with UPT KPH Region II Pematang Siantar. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1115(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1115/1/012060
Rachmawan, D., Seda, F. S. S. E., & Siburian, R. (2021). Melengkapi Analisa Teori Akses dengan Pendekatan Kolaboratif pada Konteks Program Perhutanan Sosial: Studi Kasus Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH) Rawa Sakti, Pemalang. Jurnal Kawistara, 11(2), 156–173.
Rahmatullah, R. (2012). Model Kemitraan Pemerintah dengan Perusahaan dalam Mengelola CSR: Studi Kasus di Kota Cilegon. Sosio Informa: Kajian Permasalahan Sosial Dan Usaha Kesejahteraan Sosial, 17(1).
Rahmawati, A., Rahma, E., Djahratun, S., & others. (2022). Sistem Operasional Syariah (Bagi Hasil/Profit Sharing). Al-Mizan: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 5(1).
Roosanti, N. G., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Karjoko, L. (2022). Forestry Partnership as an Alternative for Settlement of Forestry Disputes in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i7-02
sitinurbaya.com. (2021). Pembangunan Wilayah Terpadu Berbasis Hutan Sosial. http://sitinurbaya.com/pembangunan-wilayah-terpadu-berbasis-hutan-sosial
Solie, A. T., Supratman, Malamassam, D., & Ridwan. (2020). Analysis of social forestry governance in Jeneberang i forest manajement unit. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/486/1/012030
Srivastava, D., & Verma, A. (2022). Workers Participation in Management. The Social ION, 11(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.5958/2456-7523.2022.00006.4
Sumual, F. F. B., Mandagi, M., & Kairupan, S. B. (2022). Forestry Partnership Policy Between Farmer Group and Production Forest Management Unit Poigar Model. www.techniumscience.com
Sunarso, S. (2022). Gagalnya Program Perhutanan Sosial: Studi Kasus LMDH Ngimbang Makmur, Desa Ngimbang, Kecamatan Palang, Kabupaten Tuban. MEDIA BINA ILMIAH, 16(8), 7301–7312.
Supriyanto, H., Sudarmo, S., & Setyowati, K. (2021). Implementation of Social Forestry in Perum Perhutani Kph Telawa. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 18(1), 31–43.
Widati, S., Triyuwono, I., & Sukoharsono, E. G. (2011). Wujud, Makna dan Akuntabilitas “Amal Usaha” sebagai Aset Ekonomi Organisasi Religius Feminis. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 2(3), 369–380.
Yang, C., & Shang, H. (2023). Does forestry public-private partnership promote the development of China’s forestry economy? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1135035
Downloads
Published
31-07-2025
How to Cite
Ramadhan, T., Sukoharsono, E. G., & Purwanti, L. (2025). Criticism of Accountability in Social Forestry Partnership from Habermas Perspective. Jurnal Ilmiah Bisnis Dan Ekonomi Asia, 19(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.32815/jibeka.v19i2.2259
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Taufiq Ramadhan, Eko Ganis Sukoharsono, Lilik Purwanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Happy reading. Do not forget to cite. Thank you.
